Advanced Search

We found 0 results. View results
Advanced Search
we found 0 results
Your search results

Questions raised about letting agents in England and Wales

Posted by Let Me Properties on May 17, 2019
| 0

Friday 17th May 2019

Questions raised about letting agents in England and Wales

Consumer organization Which? recently undertook a mystery-shopping exercise at 20 letting agents in England and Wales and unearthed some disappointed results, including potential breaches of consumer law.

Five lettings agents required financial commitments before allowing customers to see contracts

One quarter of agents surveyed would only allow prospective tenants to view contracts once they had provided a financial commitment or a holding deposit and some of these further required a reference check to be undertaken (at the customer’s expense) before allowing them to see the contract.

Concerningly, three of these lettings agents were members of ARLA Propertymark.

Which? believes that the actions of these lettings agents could put them in breach of consumer law as they could make it difficult for tenants to shop around (due to the cost of doing so) and hence potentially limit their purchasing options and hence their ability to make an informed decision as to whether or not the contract in question is the right one for them.

A further lettings agent was prepared to provide a contract, but required the customer to visit their office to read it on-site. Which? believes that this behaviour could also be illegal by placing the customer under pressure to read the contract quickly, although in this instance the counter-argument could be made that it gave the customer the opportunity to ask questions and to clarify any points of confusion in the contract.

The wording of contracts was considered to be highly questionable

At this point it has to be recognized that drawing up legal documents is a complex process, even in the case of fairly standardized documents such as residential tenancy agreements.

It also has to be acknowledged that it can be extremely difficult to strike an appropriate balance between including enough detail without confusing the reader (given that the average customer at a lettings agent is unlikely to be a legal expert) and leaving sufficient flexibility to allow for different situations and changing circumstances (this will become especially relevant if the government does introduce three-year minimum tenancies).

This reality could give lettings agents some defence against the findings that some contracts were unreasonably vague. Sadly, Which? discovered that some contracts were not (just) vague but contained stipulations which were of questionable legality, for example some lettings agents required tenants to inform their lettings agent or landlord that they intended to switch utility tariffs and some even required the tenants to seek the permission of their lettings agent or landlord.

In law, tenants must be free to change utility supplier if they so wish. Again, however, Which? has not provided clarity as to why these clauses were put in place. It could simply be that lettings agents and landlords want to keep tabs on what is happening in the property so they know who to contact if they need to, e.g. if the tenant unexpectedly leaves the property without paying their rent.

Mark Burns is the managing director of Indlu estate agents in Manchester 

Article courtesy of Landlord Today | Sign up for Landlord Today newsletter | Get this news on YOUR site!

  • Property Search

  • Testimonials

    Unable to sell a property in the current market and with minimal knowledge of the letting world we turned to Gregory and his team at Let Me Properties to be our guides through the process. Our initial meeting with Gregory was not only productive in terms of identifying a way forward but he gave us confidence that in his hands the venture would be a success. Following discussions regarding the optimum layout it soon became apparent that significant investment would be required to bring the property up to a standard necessary for rental and we had no hesitation in allowing Gregory to project manage this on our behalf. The structural modifications carried out made best use of the space available and the suggestions regarding fixtures and fittings made perfect sense and obviously complied with all legal obligations. I am confident that the cost of this management service was repaid many times over in the savings made by using a tried and trusted team of contractors. With any project of this nature there will undoubtedly be unforeseen incidents along the way but they were all dealt with in a prompt and professional manner that removed all burden from ourselves. Once work was complete there was no delay in marketing the property and within days there were a number of offers to rent. The information provided to establish a preferred candidate was thorough allowing an informed choice to be made which appears to have been to everybody's benefit. A few months down the line and communication from Let Me has remained of a high standard and minor teething issues with the property have been dealt with promptly and with little fuss. We would definitely recommend both the letting and project management services offered by Let Me Properties. Read more Read lessJon YoungOctober 16, 2019

    – Click here to see more

Compare Listings